|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- NSA (Chair)
- SNFU
- Defra
- SAC
- NOAH
- AHDA
- RUMA
- CSL
- RVC
- SVS
|
|
5
|
- The SCOPS terms of reference are :
- To advise and disseminate new recommendations on sustainable parasite
control to the sheep industry, initially concentrating on internal
parasites
- To provide a forum for feedback from the sheep and animal health
industries, veterinary profession and allied groups
- To consider new developments, feedback and information and revise the
recommendations accordingly
- To facilitate mechanisms to inform all stakeholders in the sheep
industry. Ensure that the messages have consistency and clarity.
|
|
6
|
- Over the past 20-30 years :
- dependence on anthelmintic use has increased
- anthelmintic resistance has emerged as a problem worldwide and,
latterly, in the UK
- parasite epidemiology has changed
- there is new understanding of AR and its control
- some of the strategies which have been recommended for worm control
select for AR
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- The major worm parasites of sheep in the UK include
- Gastrointestinal nematodes
- The trematode Fasciola hepatica
- The lung worms
|
|
10
|
- This presentation is concerned with the gastrointestinal nematodes, and
not the lungworms,
- and brief mention is made of
- Fasciola hepatica.
|
|
11
|
- Broad-spectrum anthelmintics fall into three main classes:
- BZ
- LM
- ML
|
|
12
|
- the parasite can tolerate anthelmintic doses which are normally lethal
- the ability to do so is heritable
|
|
13
|
- faecal egg count reduction trials (FECRT)
- resistance is declared if dosing does not reduce FEC by at least 95%
- anthelmintics may ‘appear’ to be still working even if reduction in FEC
is only 60% to 80%
- resistance is also measured in laboratory-based larval development
assays
|
|
14
|
- resistance alleles pre-exist in most worm populations even before
anthelmintics are ever used
- then, when the anthelmintic is used, the very few worms with resistance
alleles are favoured
- resistance develops slowly at first, then more rapidly as allele
frequency increases
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- the short answer is ‘No!’
- once resistance to an anthelmintic emerges, reversion to susceptibility
is unlikely to occur
|
|
19
|
- Resistant alleles make worms less fit to survive in the absence of
anthelmintic
- So, in theory, reversion to susceptibility should occur when the
anthelmintic is not used
- Possibly, this happens in zone A
- It appears, however, that once AR is in zone B, co-adaptation to
survival means that resistant parasites are equally fit for survival as
susceptible ones.
|
|
20
|
- The relative size of the in-refugia population.
- Frequency of treatment
- Rate of re-infection after dosing
- Dose rates
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- The larger the in-refugia population, relative to the exposed
population, the slower AR will develop.
- When an entire group of sheep is treated prior to a move to a
low-contamination pasture, the in-refugia population is relatively small.
|
|
24
|
- The relative size of the in-refugia population.
- Frequency of treatment
- Rate of re-infection after dosing
- Dose rates
|
|
25
|
- More frequent treatment selects faster for AR
- Treatment is particularly selective when frequency approaches the
pre-patent period
- Treatment gives the resistant worms a reproductive advantage over
susceptible worms
|
|
26
|
- The relative size of the in-refugia population.
- Frequency of treatment
- Rate of re-infection after dosing
- Dose rates
|
|
27
|
- After dosing, resistant parasites have a period of reproductive
advantage
- The period is shorter if the sheep become quickly re-infected.
- If re-infection is delayed, resistant survivors have the advantage for
longer.
|
|
28
|
- The factors which influence re-infection rates after dosing are
- the infectivity of the pasture
- the susceptibility of the sheep
- Dosing of immune ewes may be a significant factor selecting for AR
|
|
29
|
- The relative size of the in-refugia population.
- Frequency of treatment
- Rate of re-infection after dosing
- Dose rates
|
|
30
|
- Under-dosing encouraged the rapid appearance of AR to the BZ and LM
anthelmintics
- Under-dosing allows heterozygous parasites to survive
- Full doses should kill all but homozygous-resistant parasites
|
|
31
|
- Rotations of anthelmintics
- Combinations of anthelmintics
- Prevent the entry of resistant worms onto farms from other farms.
|
|
32
|
- Rotations of anthelmintics
- Combinations of anthelmintics
- Prevent the entry of resistant worms onto farms from other farms.
|
|
33
|
- Rotations of anthelmintics
- Combinations of anthelmintics
- Prevent the entry of resistant worms onto farms from other farms.
|
|
34
|
- An 8 step strategy
- Many of the recommended steps are unchanged from previous guidelines
- There are some key new recommendations, as a result of research and
experience in UK and other countries
- Importance of involving expert advice is emphasised
|
|
35
|
- Work out a control strategy with your veterinarian or advisor.
- Use effective quarantine strategies to prevent the importation of
resistant worms in introduced sheep and goats
- Test for AR on your farm
- Administer anthelmintics effectively
- Use anthelmintics only when necessary
- Select the appropriate anthelmintic for the task
- Adopt strategies to preserve susceptible worms on the farm
- Reduce dependence on anthelmintics
|
|
36
|
- The need for specialist consultation is greater now than before.
- Decisions about judicious use of anthelmintics in worm control programs
are complex, and will require on-going consultations
|
|
37
|
- Introduction of resistance alleles is considered a major cause of AR in
UK flocks.
- The recommended strategy involves three steps:
|
|
38
|
- Step 1
- Treat all introduced sheep and goats with levamisole plus an ML
- Do not mix, dose sequentially
- Give full doses of each drug
|
|
39
|
- Step 2
- After treatment, hold animals off pasture for 24-48 hours, to empty out
any worm eggs
- Supply feed and water during that time
- Collect faeces passed during that time
- do not apply to pastures
- consider incineration, for example
|
|
40
|
- Step 3
- Then place sheep on contaminated pastures
- to allow dilution of eggs from any surviving worm parasites
- to encourage rapid re-infection with worms endemic to the farm.
|
|
41
|
- Sheep farmers must be strongly encouraged to test for AR
- A knowledge of each drug’s efficacy is fundamental
- Without this knowledge
- adequate worm control may not occur
- sensible drug rotations cannot
- be planned
|
|
42
|
- Dose for the heaviest in the group
- Check the gun is working satisfactorily
- Administer the drug correctly
|
|
43
|
- Dose for the heaviest in the group
- Check the gun is working satisfactorily
- Administer the drug correctly
|
|
44
|
- Dose for the heaviest in the group
- Check the gun is working satisfactorily
- Administer the drug correctly
|
|
45
|
- Carefully evaluate the need to dose ewes at tupping
|
|
46
|
- Carefully evaluate the need to dose ewes at tupping
- If dosing ewes at turn-out
- use highly efficacious treatments
- leave some ewes untreated
- treat well before the end of PPRI
|
|
47
|
- Carefully evaluate the need to dose ewes at tupping
- If dosing ewes at turn-out
- use highly efficacious treatments
- leave some ewes untreated
- treat well before the end of PPRI
- Use FEC monitoring to assist decision-making
|
|
48
|
- Use narrow-spectrum drugs when possible
- eg, closantel for Haemonchus
- Avoid off-target use
- particularly in fluke-nematode combinations
- Rotate anthelmintics when appropriate
- do not let rotation choice over-rule decisions about quarantine
treatment, or narrow-spectrum drugs
- Consider risks & advantages of
- persistency of some anthelmintics
|
|
49
|
- The dose-and-move strategy has been identified as potentially selective
for AR
- part-flock treatment is expected to reduce selection
- leave 10% untreated (5% to 20%)
- use highly efficacious treatments (>99% efficacy)
- delay the ‘move’ after the ‘dose’
|
|
50
|
- Use grazing management, rather than anthelmintics, to provide ‘safe’
grazing
|
|
51
|
- Use grazing management, rather than anthelmintics, to provide ‘safe’
grazing
- Use rams selected for low FEC to breed ewe replacements
|
|
52
|
- Faecal egg counts (FECs) can give a useful guide to the level of
parasitism in a flock of sheep
- But, there are important limitations to their use as a monitoring tool
|
|
53
|
- Sample size
- At least 10 animals should be sampled to estimate a group mean FEC
- A ‘group’ is a flock of animals of the same sex, age, reproductive
status and treatment history, running in the same field
- The faeces from 10 sheep may be pooled at the laboratory - it should
not be mixed before then.
|
|
54
|
- What is a suitable group?
- Animals that are fully-fed and in satisfactory health
- Results are reported as eggs per gram of faeces
- If feed intake is impaired, faecal volume is reduced, and results are
impossible to interpret
|
|
55
|
- Collection of faeces
- Gather the group, hold quietly in one area, then gather faeces from the
pasture
|
|
56
|
- Collection of faeces
- Gather the group, hold quietly in one area, then gather faeces from the
pasture
- Place faeces in airtight container and cool
- Deliver to laboratory within 48 hours
|
|
57
|
- Gather the group into one place in the field.
- Remove the dog, and let them stand quietly.
- For a group of 200 ewes, 3-4 minutes is sufficient. Smaller groups
require more time.
|
|
58
|
- Let the sheep move quietly away.
- Pick up faeces from the pasture and place in a container or small
plastic bag.
- Select only warm, freshly-dropped specimens.
- Keep each specimen in a separate
bag or container.
|
|
59
|
- Interpretation of results
- Interpret with local knowledge
- Remember: FECs cannot ‘detect’ burdens of immature worms
- Consider the different relationships between worm numbers and egg
numbers in
- different worm species
- sheep of different age and reproductive status
|
|
60
|
- Price and availability
- A FEC test is available from a number of laboratories and veterinary
practices
- VLA labs offer a pooled test (10 samples) for £15.60 + VAT
|
|
61
|
- FECs can be used to detect the presence of AR
- Simple tests
- 7 to 14 days post-treatment
- A quick and easy test for the presence of AR
- Formal tests
- Set up with randomised groups, and controls
- Calculate a percent reduction
- < 95% reduction implies resistance
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
- Liver fluke control is based on a number of drugs (fasciolicides) with
different activities
- Resistance to some fasciolicides has developed in the UK and other
countries
- Control programmes should consider the need to reduce selection pressure
for resistance to these drugs
- Quarantine strategies should aim to reduce
- the risk of importing resistant fluke.
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
- Rotational use of TCB, closantel or nitroxynil, where appropriate
- Consider the use of drugs other than TCB when fluke burdens are expected
to be entirely or mostly of adult fluke
|
|
67
|
- Performed for one of three reasons
- Farm has no snail habitat
- treat to improve the health of the sheep
- Farm has snail habitat, but no fluke
- treat to prevent entry of all fluke
- Farm has endemic fluke
- treat to prevent entry of resistant fluke
|
|
68
|
- Develop a strategy after considering:
- Resistance to TCB is still relatively uncommon in the UK
- Treatment of TCB alone will not remove TCB-resistant fluke
- Treatment with closantel or nitroxynil is expected to prevent the
output of fluke eggs for at least 8 weeks
- Resistance to closantel and to nitroxynil can occur.
- Treatment with more than one product will reduce the risk of
introducing fluke with resistance
- to any one product.
- but the use of two products at the same
- time may be injurious to health
|
|
69
|
- This presentation was brought to you by SCOPS.
- Sustainable Control of Parasites in Sheep.
- See also
- www.nationalsheep.org.uk
|